Update | A friend of mine shared this essay with Eric Metaxas on Twitter, and Eric read and responded:

Some years ago, a mentor and friend of mine turned me on to a little event called Socrates in the City hosted by a man named Eric Metaxas. I was a bit younger when I first heard about these forays into discussions on “life, God, and other small topics.” Whether it was my youthful lack of an attention span or the bombardment of intellectual assignments that came with higher education (and therefore cultivated a desire to be brain dead during my free time), I never took the dive into the rich diversity of intelligent, Christian thinkers, speakers, and writers. That is, I never took that dive until recently.

A little over a year ago, I got hooked on podcasts and thoroughly enjoyed the bevy of different scientists, philosophers, theologians, and other various scholars who were producing and sharing excellent content through the Internet. As I sought out new content, I remembered Socrates in the City and would go on to enjoy a handful of those interviews.

As I did so, I could not help but be impressed by Eric Metaxas. His sense of humor fit my tastes. Not only did I find him to be entertaining, but I found him to be insightful. As I started to learn more about Eric, I came to discover that he would be hosting a daily radio broadcast billed as a show about “everything.” Needless to say, I was excited; my expectations were high.

When the day rolled around for his first show, I was listening live through the webcast. When the live broadcast time ceased to fit my schedule, I would diligently follow along with the show via podcast. Through his show, Metaxas introduced me to numerous thinkers and authors about whom I had never heard, and his dry wit made each episode at least stimulating, though he usually produced more than mere entertainment. I often found the show to be genuinely thought provoking, challenging, and even at times inspiring.

Yet, in the last couple of weeks, he has turned a corner that seems truly perplexing given his knowledge of social history.

Eric Metaxas, the man who has written biographies on William Wilberforce and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, appears to be missing his own chance to shine in this difficult cultural moment. Bonhoeffer and Wilberforce each took radical stands in the face of extraordinarily immoral, corrupt governing structures and poured out their lives as a sacrifice to their God, fully trusting Him by giving their all in order to undermine tyranny.

Theirs was a self-sacrificial battle against all odds. In recent days, Metaxas’s example and apparent plea for Christians in America seems to be that we should play the odds.

In an interview with Mike Gallagher, Metaxas responds to a question from Mike about his losing the goodwill of some evangelical Christians, according to an unnamed writer citied during the exchange, by advocating for Donald Trump in the upcoming presidential election.* In response to this criticism, Metaxas first calls some evangelicals who refuse to vote for Trump “liberals,” which without further context makes little sense. Then, he goes into further detail on those who, from a standpoint of principle, say that they could never vote for Donald Trump, basically chastising them as being practical supporters of Hillary Clinton who are ushering in the end of America.

Now, given the terrible option afforded to us with this year’s nominees, I would not begrudge anyone for saying that Trump would be the better choice over Clinton. I find this to be the worst of all possible worlds in terms of the choice that the American people have given themselves. Even so, Metaxas has essentially called Christians who refuse to attach their consciences to the Trump train either liberals or dunces who need to get with the program.

I’m sure that Metaxas realizes that, when he makes such statements, he is painting up the likes of Dr. Russell Moore and Al Mohler as clowns, not just insignificant blog voices like my own. For several reasons, even tacitly endorsing Donald Trump entails that the Christian is going to have to carefully tiptoe around some land mines. In Trump, we have a serial philanderer who makes (at best) reckless (at worst racist) comments about minorities. What does it look like for a Christian to support such a man after denouncing others who have behaved as he has in the past?

From a standpoint of grace and charity, we could emphasize that those selfish, narcissistic, indulgent attitudes were in the past, but Trump has repeatedly stated that he sees little reason to seek forgiveness. Christians don’t have that card to play.

If the argument coming from the evangelical community was different, if the voices were saying, “This is the best we’ve got; let’s hold our noses, vote for the man, and hope to see a brighter day in the future,” then I would be more understanding, perhaps even sympathetic. But several leaders have actually defended Trump’s character. Jerry Falwell, Jr. emphatically suggested that we should know him by his fruits and believes Trump is a Christian. Franklin Graham cited Abraham, Moses, and David as imperfect leaders who made mistakes. Such statements are beyond ludicrous. They have blatantly twisted the Bible to serve their political ends.

Granted, Eric Metaxas has not gone so far as to whitewash Trump’s past (or his present). But he has taken steps in a direction where his light will eventually become hidden (cf. Lk. 8:16).

Interestingly enough, I have been reading Eric’s book, If You Can Keep It, as this mess with evangelicals and Trump has taken a turn for the worse. Aside from moments where he practically idolizes America as the world’s last, best hope (what about Christ and His Church? cf. Jn 8:12), the book was wonderfully written. Though Metaxas often trumpets his book whenever he proclaims his support for Trump, I feel as though he actually undermines the book’s core message every time he does so. That message? The people of the United States will maintain this republic if and only if her citizens remain a people of virtue.

Ironically, he dedicates an entire chapter to our need for moral leaders to help us become and/or continue to be a virtuous people. Here’s a significant quotation from that chapter:

And this is the main point to be made here, that the character of our leaders is important because it affects everyone–their peers and those they lead. And if a virtuous people is vital to self-government, as we have established, their virtue cannot help but be affected, in one direction or the other, by the behavior of their leaders. So it follows that leaders–whether political or cultural–may encourage or discourage a wider culture of virtue. And in a nation where virtue is crucial to the entire system of self-government, character in our leaders is no small thing. We may again recall John Adams’s statement that the Constitution cannot contain our untoward passions–that they will break through the Constitution as easily “as a whale goes through a net.” So we need a culture of virtue, and our leaders have a vital role to play in that regard.

Honest question: how can the man who wrote so beautifully on our need for virtue and virtuous leaders openly endorse Donald Trump?

*This interchange takes place starting around the 6:30 mark.

24 thoughts on “Et Tu Metaxas?

  1. My brother, Brandon, you have done it again, sir! I love Metaxas and respect the man but when he says these kinds of things, I almost can’t take him seriously. I noticed that he would say similar things in his interviews with John Zmirak (of TheStream.com I think).

    I am tempted to share this on Twitter to Mr. Metaxas, but I don’t want to start nothing! Haha!

    1. I’ve thought about doing the same thing. He read one email he received on the radio yesterday. So, I know that he’s being inundated with these types of responses.

  2. I haven’t followed the entire story behind these current events surrounding Eric, and his vite fir Trump. Here’s my take for what it’s worth…
    Trump isn’t GOP-typical, so everyone is in a spin from the Christian perspective. Hillary is on the other hand liberal/dem soup dujour, you know– ethically challenged. There are two choices here, pick one:
    1. Don’t vote
    2. Vote for Trump

  3. I completely understand this blog. I struggle with my Christian beliefs v Donald Trump. I also understand Metaxas’ perspective of who will be in charge if Trump doesn’t win (it’s like the “devil you know v the devil you don’t” gambit from hell). This is my 3rd presidential election in a row voting against someone rather than voting for someone. God, please stop giving us the leadership we deserve and give us your leaders.

    1. This year has been historically bad. I agree that a vote for Trump is a desperation move. I’m praying that something happens to where we don’t have to make that choice!

      Thank you for reading!

  4. I appreciate the civil tone of the discourse with you and Eric. I am very conflicted about the choices this year, and am actually looking at the Libertarian candidates. Trump lacks the policitcal ear to serve as President, and will find that leading a diverse society requires empathy, not ridicule. I am very troubled about the arrogance or stupidity that Clinton showed with having her private server, and I think she lacks her husband’s policitcal acuity, but brings in some troubling moral compromises. I will read discussions like this to help fill in the gaps. Thanks!

    1. I’m praying that a viable third option will avail itself. I’m not sure the Libertarian candidates will be the way to go, though. I’m deeply appreciative for Eric’s tone as well!

      Thank you for reading!

  5. I feel like voting for either Hillary or Donald to be the next president is voting for the least of the two devils. But these two are our choices. I’ve had great bosses, and neither candidate lives up to what I’ve experienced as great bosses. But I am one voice amonst many, and I have to appreciate that. I am 72 years old, and lived through Vietnam and Watergate. I was born during World War II, and experienced the dedication to this country of my father and the other men and women after they came home from the war. I witnessed the appreciation shown these people shown by the rest of the country.

    Vietnam though was 180 degrees off of World War II and even Korea. And I appreciate that also. And I physically ache sometimes in seeing the 180 degree turn that this country took after Vietnam. I used to feel sorry for the people in Russia when I came to learn that the government spun the news stories in order to control the citizens. Then I came to understand that the United States government was doing the same thing during Vietnam. Unseemly behavior in my mind. But again I only have one vote.

    I wish Eric had stopped at the point of endorsing one or other candidate, but he didn’t. I too totally appreciate Socrates in the City as well as Eric’s books, etc. I would like him to let his product speak for itself. And I will continue to partake of Eric’s product.

  6. Didn’t God provide a replacement sacrifice for Issac? Is anyone relying on God to provide in our situation? He knows we are not omnipotent. He does not expect us to know the future. His only requirement is that we trust Him.

  7. Sounds like anyone that ho along with your thought process is considered a racist. At least Trump is looking out for Americans. If you don’t understand why people are backing trump for president look at the violence brought on by middle eastern immigrants. I guess in your mind the three syrian boys had a right to rape a five year old girl. This is just one example of fifthteen different violent act’s in the last two months against Americans.

    1. I’m not sure what you mean in your first sentence. If you’re saying that I have insinuated that anyone who votes for Trump is a racist, then I must reply that I don’t think that at all!

      And I certainly don’t condone any violence against innocent people. I don’t see how you got that from my post.

      I do understand the urge to vote for Trump. These are uncertain times, and Donald has the type of demeanor that leads people to believe that he’s tough.

      I just don’t think that Trump has the character necessary to effectively govern a nation, especially a nation like the United States.

      I do appreciate your reading and responding!

  8. Great post. And I love Metaxas 90% of the time, too. I often think of Bonhoeffer in regard to this election. How would it feel to be a Christian who rooted for Hitler in the aftermath of the Nazi rise to power? What a horrible thing to have on your conscience! Boycotts are a legitimate form of participation in our culture; there are other ways to have an effective voice than to reluctantly stand behind the “lesser evil!”

    1. I wouldn’t imagine that the majority of people who voted for Hitler ever imagined he would become the terror he became. The primary reason that’s even a thought for us today is because of what happened in Germany.

      With the way that our government is set up as well as how scrupulous the media covering him would be, Trump would not easily become a genuine dictator. Like Justin Bieber, I guess one should never say never, but I seriously doubt that such a thing would be possible.

      1. True, we are unlikely to see our democracy totally crash in an instant. But then again, the Germans (Austrians, Poles, etc) probably didn’t see it coming, either. That’s why we put our faith in God and not politics!

  9. God gave me one word – rather a name that put Trump into perspective for me months ago as I was wrestling in prayer for the direction and leadership of our country- I have had total peace since then. Nebuchadnezzar – as in a previous narcissistic ass that God used for His purposes and His glory – Christians please – is our God sovereign? The name Trump is now only a reminder to me to pray for God’s will to be done in our amazing country – as it is in heaven.

  10. “If the argument coming from the evangelical community was different, if the voices were saying, “This is the best we’ve got; let’s hold our noses, vote for the man, and hope to see a brighter day in the future,” then I would be more understanding, perhaps even sympathetic.”

    Yes! Thank you. Why do so many Christians try to justify his actions? Their defense of his character scares me as much or more than he does!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s